Simple search of free and LexisNexis legal content for Australia
– legislation, cases, practical guidance, forms & precedents, journals and newsletters.
Cases
- Vancouver General Hospital v McDaniel
- Varipati & Co, In re
- Middleditch v Ellis
- Gilbertson v Richards
- Ewre v Strickland
- Brett v Cumberland
- Lyme Regis Corporation v Henley
- R v Arnesby Inhabitants
- Waters v Waters
- Whittell v Dudin
- Carlile v Brogden
- Oakes v Durk
- Sawyer Massey Co v Ritchie
- Groves v Somerville
- R v Southwark Borough Council
- R v Southwark Borough Council, Ex parte Southwark Borough Market Trustees
- Neilson, Re
- Beauclerk v Beauclerk
- Brady v Brady
- Grose v Grose
- Hartley v Ellnor
- Cowles v Dunbar & Callow
- R v Tuberfield
- Bailey v Saunders
- Cross v Watts
- Brady v Todd
- Payne v Leconfield
- Dingle v Hare
- Howard v Sheward
- Brooks v Hassall
- Baldry v Bates
- Cornwal v Wilson
- Bannerman v White
- Maskelyne v Stollery
- Eden v Blake
- Smith v MacGowan
- Terrene Ltd v Nelson
- A J S Bank v Croudace
- Peckover v Defries
- Goldham v Edwards
- Goldham v Edwards
- Lettman v Brokes Hill Pty Ltd
- Carrodus v Sharp
- Master v Miller
- Drummond v Tillinghist
- Lea v Whitaker
- Cooper v London & Brighton Railway Company
- Rottenberg v Monjack
- R v Ba'dry
- R v Rea
- R v Thomas
- R v Garner
- Mearing v Hellings
- Cotton v Thurland
- Smith v Bickmore
- Bate v Cartwright
- Henderson v Wild
- Simat v Silva
- Mitchell, In re
- Mumford v Hitchcock
- R v North
- Ollive, Ex parte; Re Moon
- Bower v Swadling
- Slater, Ex parte
- Sand's Case, Re
- Humphrey v Bullen
- Johns v Rowe
- Lord Teynham v Tyler
- Crease v Barrett
- De Rutzen (Baron) v Farr
- Marshall v Holloway
- Bainbrigge v Blair
- Richardson v Allen
- Parker v Hutchison
- Crawshay v Thornton
- Newton v Webster
- Hall v Loder
- Blake v Knight
- Cattlin v Brown
- Knapping v Tomlinson
- Davis v Bennett
- Arrow v Mellish
- Abrey v Newman
- Brown, Ex parte
- Creen v Wright
- Hiscox v Batchelor
- Fairman v Oakford
- Thaherne v Gardner
- O'Rourke v Commissioner for Railways
- Maplebrek, Re
- Haller v Robinson
- Ellis, Re
- Johnson, Ex parte
- Collen v Wright
- R v Fogg
- Goodchap v Nixon
- Blake v Beech
- Thomas v Clark and Todd
- Hunter v Fry
- Leaming v Smith
- McDonald v Gagan
- Cox v Mayor of London
- Lord Auckland v Westminster Local Board
- Sandiman v Breach
- Federal Bank v Kretschman
- Keddle, Ex parte
- Sempill v Campbell
- King v McIvor
- Neale v Ellis
- Brunskill v Powell
- Wickham v Lee
- Cooksey v Haynes
- Nathan v Field
- Shoveller v Ramsay
- Humphery v Gordon
- Emery v Barclay
- Heinz v Walker
- Keane v K
- Yeatman v Y
- Drinkwater v Arthur
- Berdan v Greenwood
- Hawksley v Bradshaw
- Lucan v Smith
- Thompson v Thompson
- Cannan v Bryce
- McKinnell v Robinson
- Treherne v Gardner
- Miller v Miller
- Spooner v Spain
- Cunliffe v Sefton
- Todd v Emly
- Sopwith v S
- Horwitz v H
- Pearman v P
- Narracott v N
- Goode v G
- Corpe v Overton
- Harvey v Mitchell
- Dench v Dench
- Trimble v Hill
- Wentworth v Humphrey
- Waratah Municipality v Waratah Company
- Peake v Highfield
- Walker v Walker
- Bruere v B
- Alexander v Mayor & Corporation of Sydney
- Company of African Merchants v British & Foreign Marine Insurance Co
- M'Connel v Murphy
- McIntosh, Ex parte
- Cockayne v Hodgkisson
- Ah Hing, Ex parte
- Grice v Shaw
- Watts v Symes
- Lord Compten v Oxenden
- Perdriau v Moore
- Wigzell v School for Indigent Blind
- Land v Devaynes
- Lord Brooke v Earl of Warren
- Domvile v Taylor
- Bremner v Walker
- Steele v Brannan
- R v Ramsay
- Mining Royal Society v Magney
- Evans v Watson
- Gaslight Improvement Company v Terrell
- Bevan v Nunn
- Lacey, In re
- Ivell, Ex parte
- Monson, Ex parte
- Walker v Cargill
- Gibbs v Pike
- Parker v Falkiner
- Humphery v McMullen
- R v Moody
- R v Smith
- R v Richardson
- Attorney-General v Corporation of Newcastle
- Lord Townshend v Windham
- Buckle v Mitchell
- Heffield v Meadows
- Nottingham Hide, Skin and Fat Market Co v Bottrill
- Hargreave v Smee
- Dale, Ex parte
- Jackson, In re
- Wright v Castle
- Hoskins v Phillips
- Robson v Eaton
- Tabernor v Tabernor
- Beddy v Smith
- Crossley v Crowther
- Dwyer v Caird
- Hamilton, Ex parte
- Parle v Leistikow
- McRoberts v Carter
- Walker v Bartlett
- Seal v Hudson
- Foster v Blakelock
- Walbank v Quarterman
- Maile v Mann
- D v F