Simple search of free and LexisNexis legal content for Australia
– legislation, cases, practical guidance, forms & precedents, journals and newsletters.
Cases
- Goldschmidt v Marryat
- Kempe's Lessee v Kennedy
- Roberts v Karr
- Buckland v Newsame
- Dewdney, Ex parte; Ex parte Seaman
- Hill v Smith
- Hindle v O'Brien
- Kirk, Ex parte
- Thompson v Havelock
- Kingston v McIntosh
- Lupton v White
- Church v Mundy
- Buck v Buck
- Moss v Smith
- Hunter v Prinsep
- Hotham v Sutton
- Hollis v Smith
- Neal v Viney
- Church v Brown
- Bamfield v Massey
- Lester v Garland
- Ward v Hepple
- Snowdon v Davis
- Higham v Ridgway
- Hartley v Rice
- Norfolk, Duke of v Worthy
- R v Dodd
- Amey v Long
- R v Emden
- Turner v Meyers
- Yallop, Ex parte
- Ackerman, Ex parte
- Mountford, Ex parte
- Finch v Finch
- Hardwicke (Earl) v Vernon
- Laing v Chatham
- Sadler v Robins
- Evans v Bennett
- Bishop of Durham v Beaumont
- Lowes v Lush
- Gillett v Mawman
- Compton v Compton
- Feize v Thompson
- Lightly v Clouston
- Buchanan v Rucker
- Spilsbury v Micklethwaite
- Crockford v Winter
- Beckwith v Sydebotham
- Hughes v Hughes
- Dummer v Chippenham Corp
- Milnes v Gery
- De Havilland v Bowerbank
- Poole v Bousfield
- Garrick v Lord Camden
- Farnsworth v Garrard
- Amey v Long
- Madden v Kempster
- Delver v Barnes
- Doe d Otley v Manning
- Godsall v Boldero
- Huguenin v Baseley
- Frame v Dawson
- Cole v Wade
- Harmer v Plane
- Wasp, The
- Cobb v Stokes
- West v Moore
- Gray v Cook
- Fisher v Mowbray
- Whitelocke v Baker
- Gurney v Longman
- Buckmaster v Harrop
- Warrington v Furbor
- Good v Blewitt
- R v Archbishop of Canterbury
- R v Luffe
- Pemberton v Pemberton
- Doe d Lockwood v Clarke & Brown
- Pitcher v Bailey
- Jones, Ex parte
- Curtis v Price
- Perry v Barker
- Taylor v Okey
- Thellusson v Woodford
- Vowles v Young
- Crosbie v M'Doual
- Banner v Lowe
- Powell v Layton
- Lowther v Lord Lowther
- Halsey v Grant
- Ex parte Cranmer, Re
- Mason v Armitage
- Blagden v Bradbear
- Hughes v Williams
- Smith v Clarke
- Davis v West
- R v Hopkins
- Spenceley v Schulenburgh
- Sanders v Pope
- Hennegall v Evance
- Matthewson v Stockdale
- Doe v Johnson
- R v Commissioners of the Court of Requests in the City of London
- Vaux v Henderson
- Rushforth v Hadfield
- Templer v M'Lachlan
- Gerrard v Cooke
- Donne v Lewis
- Ogilvie v Herne
- Huddleston v Briscoe
- Attorney-General v Corporation of Carmarthen
- Pilling v Armitage
- Raphael v Boehm
- Fludyer v Cocker
- Dolder v Huntingfield
- Harnett v Yielding
- Lord St John v Lady St John
- Gaskarth v Lowther
- Twogood, Ex parte
- James v Dean
- Earl of Radnor v Shafto
- Adair v New River Co
- Crooke v De Vandes
- Sutton, Ex parte
- Palmer v Neave
- Crosby v Wadsworth
- Bignol v Bignol
- Thellusson v Woodford
- Rushforth v Hadfield
- Wharam v Routledge
- Ellis v Mortimer
- Taylor v Hare
- Capp v Topham
- Doe v Copestake
- Henfree v Bromley
- Beckford v Wade
- Holyland, Ex parte
- Broome v Monck
- Ex parte Warren, Re
- Attorney-General v Owen
- Morice v Bishop of Durham
- Lench v Lench
- Dyer v Hargrave
- Burrowes v Lock
- Stackhouse v Barnston
- United States v Fisher
- Hoffman v Norris
- Randall v Errington
- Bennett, Ex parte
- Rider v Kidder
- Mortlock v Buller
- Knee, Ex parte
- Wright v Morley
- Lane v Newdigate
- Lincoln, Lady v Pelham
- Garland, Ex parte
- Gilham v Locke
- Garthshore v Chalie
- R v Palmer and Hudson
- Jackson v Jackson
- Bloxham v Hubbard
- De Manneville v De Manneville
- Fleming q. t. v Bailey
- Stickland v Aldridge
- Sisters, The
- R v Picton
- Wain v Warlters
- Morice v Bishop of Durham
- Jones v Gibbons
- Hercy v Birch
- Fowle v Freeman
- Twisden v Twisden
- Newman v Walters
- Hatch v Hatch
- Chambers v Goldwin
- Jones v Ashburnham
- Mountford v Gibson
- Trimmer v Bayne
- Brown v Higgs
- Rogers v Clifton
- Wardens etc of St Paul's, London v Morris
- Griffiths v Vere
- Coming, Ex parte
- Harmood v Oglander
- Mitford v Mitford
- Benfield v Solomons
- Ainslie v Medlycott
- Houghton v Matthews
- R v Denbyshire Justices
- Barnes v Patch
- R v Eastbourne (Inhabitants)
- Cooper v Martin
- Jackson, Ex parte
- Leame v Bray
- Hadkinson v Robinson
- Thunder on the demise of Weaver v Belcher
- Cartwright v Green
- Aldrich v Cooper
- James, Ex parte
- Hogg v Kirby