Simple search of free and LexisNexis legal content for Australia
– legislation, cases, practical guidance, forms & precedents, journals and newsletters.
Cases
- Page v Adam
- Batt v Anns
- Attorney-General v Dulwich College
- R v Brown
- Mondel v Steel
- Perry v Meddowcroft
- Hatton v Finch
- Neilson v Harford
- Hilton v Earl of Granville
- Panton v Williams
- R v Birmingham & Gloucester Railway Company
- Fisher v Dudding
- Bethell v Blencowe
- Wyld v Pickford
- Duncuft v Albrecht
- Jones v Roberts
- Caudle v Seymour
- Howard v Crowther
- Saunders v Vautier
- Waring v King
- Fouldes v Willoughby
- Beeching v Westbrook
- Hills v Hills
- Doe v Dobell
- Abington v Lipscomb
- Hills v Hills
- Chaney v Payne
- Bunch v Kennington
- Hall & Hinds, Re Arbitration between
- Sidebotham v Barrington
- Fergusson v Fyffe
- Westminster, The
- Westmorland, The
- R v Cheltenham Commissioners
- Carpenter v Buller
- Smith v Fell
- Jones v Gooday
- Shuttleworth v Howarth
- Howard v Shaw
- Bank of Scotland v Christie
- R v Bartlett
- Jackson v Cocker
- Landell v Landell
- Bonser v Cox
- Fyler v Fyler
- Wood v Leadbitter
- Penley v Watts
- Merry v Green
- Barker v Smark
- Hood v Phillips
- Ford v Yates
- Sweet v Cater
- Shrewsbury v Blount
- McLeod v McGhie
- Jefferys v Jefferys
- Wheeler v Senior
- Macclesfield v Bradley
- Chisman v Count & Hawley
- Humble v Langston
- Mayer v Townsend
- Jephson v Howkins
- R v Inhabitants of Chawton
- Dickens v Lee
- Cocker v Tempest
- Thompson v Gibson
- Jones v Moore
- Taylor v Rundell
- Cocker v Tempest
- Peerless, In re
- Whittaker v Howe
- Wallworth v Holt
- R v Bolton
- Morgan v Thorne
- Pym v Lockyer
- Sharp's Patent, Re; Ex parte Wordsworth
- London & Birmingham Railway Company v Winter
- Preston v Grand Collier Dock Co
- Brooke v Kent
- Harwood v Baker
- Broom v Summers
- Glasscott v Governor & Co of the Copper-Miners of England
- Hyde v Wrench
- Proctor v Sargent
- Clark v Cort
- R v Baines
- Burrough v Philcox
- R v Stewart
- Williams v Owen
- Gladstone v Tempest
- Milligan v Wedge
- Hales v Darell
- Fisher v Ford
- Field v Adames
- Williams v Burgess
- Browne v Dawson
- Easum v Appleford
- Hunter v Parker
- Munro v Munro
- Hardwicke, Earle of v Douglas
- Knight v Knight
- Donaldson v Haldane
- Denys v Shuckburgh
- Gwynne v Burnell
- Gillett v Peppercorne
- Bleakley v Smith
- Rainy v Vernon
- Bailey v Gould
- R v Oxford
- Calder v Halket
- Wood v Richardson
- Waters v Weigall
- Hawthorn v Newcastle upon Tyne & North Shields Railway Co
- R v Gould
- King v Burrell
- Lucas v Beach
- Seddon v Connell
- Society for the Illustration of Practical Knowledge v Abbott
- Vaughton v Brine, Bailey & Thorne
- Hooper v Brodrick
- Curtis v Rickards
- Hodges & Smith v Welsh
- Bamford v Shuttleworth
- Waller v Lacy
- De Witte v De Witte
- Vaughan v Marquis of Headfort
- Mitchell v Ede
- Chambers v Queen's Proctor
- Donaldson, In the Goods of
- Sidmouth v Sidmouth
- R v Sweeny
- Roberts v Lloyd
- R v Martin
- R v Morris
- Pride v Fooks
- Bennett v Fowler
- Townsend v Westacott
- Muddle v Stride
- Quarman v Burnett
- Mangles v Grand Collier Dock Co
- Campbell v Campbell
- Cole v Cresswell
- Flight v Thomas
- Cadby v Martinez
- Anderson v Weston
- Sansom v Rhodes
- Sheriff of Middlesex, Case of the
- Burrough v Cranston
- Dand v Kingscote
- Christie v Unwin
- Padmore v Lawrence
- Tanner v Smith
- Lyons v De Pass
- R v Sell
- Hill v Gomme
- Rishton v Cobb
- Gillett v Wilby
- R v Frost
- Burn v Carvalho
- R v Parker
- Walmesley v Cooper
- Watson v Hayes
- R v Sheriff of Essex
- Wellesley v Wellesley
- R v Select Vestrymen of St Margaret
- Laing v Laing
- Maria, The
- R v Fordham
- Bozon v Bolland
- Taylor v Brown
- Harwood v Bartlett
- Bunbury v Bunbury
- Du Hourmelin v Sheldon
- Courtney, Re; Ex parte Pollard
- Byrom v Thompson
- Fitzgerald v Luck
- Duncan v Findlater
- Murray v Walter
- Tennant v Hamilton
- Bacon v Jones
- Sale v Sale
- Wiggins v Peppin
- Protector, The
- Lewis v Fullarton
- Bennett v Hayter
- Pickering v Pickering
- Lindo v Lindo
- Greenwood v Wakeford
- Chadwick v Trower
- Davys v Boucher
- R v Allen
- Skuse v Davis
- Clough v Lambert
- R v Johnson
- Wilson v Metcalfe
- Hart v Frame
- Spears v Lord Advocate
- Broad v Ham
- Muskett v Hill
- Gas Light & Coke Co v Samuel Turner
- Holmes v Wilson