Simple search of free and LexisNexis legal content for Australia
– legislation, cases, practical guidance, forms & precedents, journals and newsletters.
Cases
- Marbury v Madison
- Harrison v Harrison
- Millman v Tucker
- Mullett v Hulton
- Hawkins v Kemp
- Tapp v Lee
- Turner v Morgan
- Page v Wiple
- Buckland v Hall
- Williams v East India Company
- Wennall v Adney
- R v Marks
- Govett v Radnidge
- Elwes v Maw
- Kent v Elstob
- Hicks v Hicks
- Detillin v Gale
- Sibley v Perry
- Trimmer v Bayne
- Cary v Abbot
- Rougemont v Royal Exchange Assurance Co
- Taylor v Croker
- Doe d Cox v Roe
- Fenton v Hughes
- Stevenson v Lambard
- Seton v Slade
- Man v Shiffner & Ellis
- Mersey and Irwell Navigation, Company of Proprietors of the v Douglas
- Dann v Spurrier
- Hiscox v Greenwood
- Hughes, Ex parte
- Brown v Allen & Oliver
- Iveson v Harris
- Woollam v Hearn
- Pigott v Thompson
- Howe v Lord Dartmouth, Countess of Aylesbury
- Castling v Aubert
- Lloyd v Loaring
- Bromley v Holland
- Gifford, Ex parte
- Curtis v Perry
- Wright v Simpson
- Ellison v Ellison
- Lister v Lister
- Blackburn v Stupart
- Hammonds v Barclay
- Oppenheim v Russell
- Lacey, Ex parte
- United States v Schooner Peggy
- Hoop, The
- Smart v Prujean
- Sitwell v Bernard
- Reeves v Brymer
- Hope v Clifden
- Bennett v Francis
- Penton v Robart
- Penny v Porter
- Ruckers, The
- Ex parte Fletcher, Re
- Paine v Meller
- Marquis Townshend v Stangroom
- Hanson v Graham
- Codrington v Foley
- Roundell v Currer
- R v Stone
- Tappenden v Randall
- R v Inhabitants of Aldborough
- Harman v Tappenden
- R v Inhabitants of Rainham
- Bennet & Dolman, Ex parte
- Downshire, Marquis of v Lady Sandys
- Hollingsworth v Duane
- R v Egginton
- Muckleston v Brown
- McConnell v Johnston
- Eland v Karr
- Cox v Morgan
- Earl of Radnor v Reeve
- Smith v Stokes
- Lyttleton, Ex parte
- Ex parte Baker, Re
- Pocock v Reddington
- Graham v Peat
- Butterworth v Robinson
- Astley v Weldon
- Hoffman v Cooke
- Birkley v Presgrave
- Kershaw v Cox
- Jackson v Cator
- Campbell v Walker
- Penson v Lee
- Planner (decd), Re v Scudamore
- Spragg v Binkes
- Bowles v Round
- Brown v Higgs
- Hadfield's Case
- R v Smith
- Doe d Ryall v Bell
- Howson v Hancock
- Male v Roberts
- Eden v Smyth
- Forster v Hale
- Byne v Potter
- Smith, Ex parte
- Gray v Mathias
- Randall v Willis
- East India Co v Neave
- Byne v Vivian
- Beeby v Beeby
- Smith v Knox
- James v Kynnier
- Wharton v May
- Cary v Faden
- R v Inhabitants of Laindon
- Glazebrook v Woodrow
- Hall v Ody
- R v Powell
- Brown v Higgs
- Maria, The
- Exall v Partridge
- R v Wright
- Stone v Carr
- Howse v Chapman
- Thellusson v Woodford
- R v Gaskin
- Scheibel v Fairbain
- Havelock v Rockwood
- Clinton v Seymour
- Rebeckah, The
- Corbyn v French
- Martyn v Knowllys
- Thompson v Charnock
- Roe d Reade v Reade
- Booth v Booth
- Hornblower v Boulton
- Blachford v Preston
- Aquila, The
- Williams v Ladner
- Doe v Carter
- Wolff v Horncastle
- Doe d Da Costa v Wharton & Dixon
- Roberts v Pocock
- Farmer v Russell
- O'Coigly, Re
- Grindley v Barker
- Whichcote v Lawrence
- Maddocks v Holmes
- Mayor of London v Cole
- Eaton v Lyon
- Lechmere v Hawkins
- Morley v Bird
- R v Moseley
- Fowler v Padget
- Doe d. Collins v Weller
- Jones v Martin
- Greathead v Bromley
- Webb v Fox
- Wallis v Duke of Portland
- Pickering v Stamford
- Long v Blackall
- Eastabrook v Scott
- R v Inhabitants of Seton
- Maberly v Strode
- George v Clagett
- Walpole, Lord v Lord Orford
- R v Williams
- Stafford Corporation v Bolton
- Loveridge v Botham
- Fowler v Down
- Wills v Stradling
- Marriot v Hampton
- McLean (decd), Re
- Harper v Carr
- Alves v Hodgson
- R v Harris
- Batsford v Kebbell
- Harrison v Jackson, Sykes & Rushforth
- Tenant v Elliott
- Pickering v Lord Stanford
- Chenie v Watson
- Campbell v French
- Selwood v Mildmay
- Barnes v Rowley
- Cheetham v Ward
- Morton v Lamb
- Doe d Duke of Bedford v Kightley
- Pickering v Truste
- Davenport v Hanbury
- Brown v Raindle
- Gordon v Harper
- Wiscart v Dauchy
- Elton, Ex parte
- Mosely v Virgin
- Lord Cranstown v Johnston
- Quintin, Ex parte
- Willingham v Joyce
- Jones v Perry
- Worsley v Wood
- Boulton v Bull
- Parker v Norton