Part 7.10 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) prohibits market misconduct and certain other conduct relating to financial products and financial services.
Division 2 of Pt 7.10 deals with various kinds of prohibited conduct, other than insider trading, including market manipulation and misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to a financial product or financial service. That conduct is addressed separately. See the Prohibited Conduct Relating to Financial Products and Financial Services overview).
Division 3 of Pt 7.10 contains the insider trading prohibitions and is addressed here.
Insider trading occurs where a person (the insider), while in possession of “inside information” (price-sensitive information not generally available) which they know or ought reasonably to know is inside information:
-
applies for, acquires or disposes of certain financial products (known as “relevant Div 3 financial products”) or enters into an agreement to do this (known as the trading prohibition) (see s 1043A(1) );
-
procures another person to apply for, acquire or dispose of relevant Div 3 financial products or to enter into an agreement to do this (known as the procuring prohibition (see s 1043A(1) ); or
-
communicates the information, or causes the information to be communicated to another person where the insider knows or ought reasonably to know that the other person is likely to:
and the relevant financial products are able to be traded on an Australia financial market (known as the communicating or "tipping" prohibition): see s 1043A(2) .
There are then three kinds of insider trading prohibitions. Engaging in insider trading is a criminal offence. The insider trading provisions are also civil penalty provisions.
As the prohibitions apply to a person who possesses inside information and engages in the relevant conduct when they know or ought reasonably to know that the information is inside information, an insider can be anyone including a corporation.
For a discussion of the policy rationales for prohibiting insider trading, see, for example,R v Mansfield at [49]–[57] (appeal dismissedMansfield v R ) andR v Firns at [40]–[63].
The insider trading provisions are complex and operate by reference to various definitions of terms found mainly in Div 3 itself. Therefore, it is important to be familiar with the structure of Div 3 which is as follows:
-
subdivision A (ss 1042A–1042H ) contains definitions of the terms used in Div 3 such as “Division 3 financial products”, “generally available”, “information”, “inside information”, “material effect” and “relevant Division 3 financial products” as well as other preliminary matters; and
-
Subdivision B (ss 1043A–1043O ) then contains:
There are a number of common elements which apply to each prohibition. There must be a jurisdictional connection; the conduct must relate to “Division 3 financial products”; there must be “information” which is “possessed”; that information must be “inside information” and the insider must know or ought reasonably to know that information is inside information. In addition, in each case, it will need to be determined whether any exceptions or defences may be available.
Therefore, the following considerations are relevant in determining whether there has been a contravention of the insider trading prohibitions:
-
whether there is the required connection with Australia;
-
whether the conduct relates to “Division 3 financial products”;
-
whether there is information;
-
whether the information is possessed;
-
whether the information is not generally available;
-
whether, if the information were generally available, a reasonable person would expect it to have a material effect on the price or value of particular Div 3 financial products;
-
whether the insider knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that:
-
whether the insider:
Note that the regulations may make exemptions and modifications to Pt 7.10 (see s 1045A and Corporations Regulations 7.10.03).