Most plant and equipment is subject to depreciation, where the owner can claim a tax deduction for a certain percentage of its value each year. Plant and equipment is not subject to Capital Gains Tax, as it is “otherwise assessable” under s 118.20 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (ITAA).

The sale of plant and equipment as part of a sale of business is a “balancing adjustment event” within the meaning of ss 40-280 to 40-370 of the ITAA. Under these provisions, the vendor is liable for income tax if the plant and equipment is sold for more than its depreciated or written down value. Similarly, the vendor will be entitled to a tax deduction for the difference between the written down value of an asset and its sale price, if it is sold for less than the written down value.

Even though the overall contract price has been agreed, there is often debate as to how much should be allocated to goodwill, as opposed to plant and equipment. The vendor will usually try to minimize the figure for plant and equipment, to minimize income tax, as this is usually higher than the capital gains tax applying to goodwill.

The contract for sale of business will usually divide the agreed purchase price into:

• goodwill;

• plant and equipment; and

• stock.

However, careful examination of the balancing adjustment provisions of the ITAA shows that it is the value of the assets, not the expressed purchase price that should be taken into account in calculating any balancing adjustments to the vendor’s tax.

A purchaser will be able to claim a tax deduction for depreciation for plant and equipment, but not goodwill, which cannot be depreciated, for tax purposes. Accordingly, the purchaser will try to reduce the amount expressed to be paid for goodwill with a corresponding increase in the amount allocated for plant and equipment.

This can lead to arguments between the vendor and purchaser. However, the ITAA states that, where several assets are bought together, it is the value of the relevant asset which counts in calculating future tax deductions for depreciation, not the stated price breakdown.

The same considerations and the same laws apply to other assets sold as part of the business including:

• improvements to land;

• fixtures forming part of real property, even if they are not removable;

• computer software; and

• intellectual property, including copyright, registered design and patent.

This is pursuant to s 40.30 of the ITAA.

See Tax considerations.

The plant and equipment included in the sale of business are often subject to an equipment lease, or similar finance arrangement.

On a sale of business, the use of this equipment can be transferred to the purchaser by paying out the finance company on settlement or by novating or transferring the existing equipment lease.

If the lease is to be novated or transferred, this needs to be covered by careful provisions in the contract, including provisions to the following effect:

• each of the parties shall take all steps reasonably necessary to obtain the consent of the finance company to such novation or transfer; and

• if such consent cannot be obtained, or if such consent can only be obtained on unreasonable terms, then:

If the lease is paid out, the purchaser’s solicitor should ensure that any registration of the finance company’s interest over the plant and equipment is discharged.

Practice Tip: The plant and equipment needs to be precisely specified in the contract. The “good enough” listing in the “big picture” rush to sign up a deal, may not withstand the cooling of ardour of the parties. Both parties need to audit the plant and equipment list at both contract and settlement. If you choose to use templates or example lists, used in other matters, it is important to ensure they are amended to cater for the matter at hand.

See Leased equipment.