Simple search of free and LexisNexis legal content for Australia
– legislation, cases, practical guidance, forms & precedents, journals and newsletters.
Hamra V RHigh Court of Australia
Judgment Date:
2017-09-13
Abstract:
The High Court of Australia has affirmed a decision that the evidence presented by a complainant in a sexual exploitation case demonstrated that there was a case to answer and that the Supreme Court of South Australia Court of Criminal Appeal did not err by failing expressly to refer to considerations of jeopardy as a factor weighing against the consideration of whether to grant permission to correct an error of law.
Criminal law | Appeals | Retrial | Double jeopardy
Published:
13/09/2017
|
LexisNexis® LegalExpress
|